Throughout many developing and middle-income countries, procurement systems can impact a range of development issues, such as governance, economic growth, and transparency. Procurement systems that promote accountability and transparency of government operations improve good governance and ensure greater value in government spending. Through the procurement of quality goods and services, governments are better able to develop sustainable sectors and free up money for other development priorities, leading to the advancement of economic growth.
USTDA's Global Procurement Initiative: Understanding Best Value (GPI) assists emerging country partners with the establishment of transparent, value-based procurement systems. Procurement officers in developing and middle-income countries often rely on least-cost analysis in evaluating bids, due to the lack of professional training or capacity to execute more sophisticated procurement mechanisms and/or because this type of analysis provides the most defensible position against accusations of corruption or fraud.
Unfortunately, the least-cost method has negative effects both for international competition and for local economies: it undercuts the ability of firms that offer high quality goods or services to compete for contracts and leads developing countries to acquire low-quality products that may not perform as required, or expected.
Recognizing that more can be done to work with partner countries to strengthen their procurement systems and catalyze related development benefits, the GPI shares best practices with officials in emerging economies about how to establish procurement systems that integrate best-value determination and life-cycle cost analysis, as well as how to promote objective evaluation through a trained, professionalized procurement workforce. These key issues are addressed in more detail below.
Partner countries have repeatedly told USTDA that their current policies do not always allow them to get the best value for their money in procurement decisions. By relying on cost as the determining factor for award, government procurement practices fail to take into account key factors such as equipment quality, operation, and service and maintenance. Least-cost analyses often lead governments to procure low quality goods with relatively short useful lives, or high ongoing operating costs, preventing the efficient development of infrastructure needed to support expanding populations and sustain economic growth.
Activities under the GPI aim to improve procurement methodologies by working with partner countries to promote the understanding and use of best-value determination. This type of analysis considers whole-life costs, quality, resource allocation, timeliness, and convenience to determine whether these elements as a whole constitute good value and provide economy, efficiency, and effectiveness. In the context of procurement decisions, best value implies that bids are not awarded to the lowest cost bidder, but to the most qualified bidder that offers the overall best value for money.
Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) is one tool that assesses value in procurement decisions and plays a large role in the GPI. LCCA quantifies the "whole-life costs" of a project, also known as the "total cost of ownership" and compares them against alternative investment options. More than a simple cost comparison, LCCA offers sophisticated methods to determine and demonstrate the relative economic merits of different purchase alternatives in an analytical and fact-based manner. LCCA offers metrics that can demonstrate that the purchase of high-quality products can lead to better long-term economic outcomes.
U.S. firms have expressed to USTDA that the increased use of LCCA would positively impact their ability to successfully compete for contracts in developing and middle income countries. Although the high-quality, high-value equipment and comprehensive maintenance agreements provided by U.S. businesses sometimes come at a higher initial purchase price, they offer lower overall costs when considering the entire useful life of the technology or equipment.
To facilitate the use of best-value determinations and life-cycle cost analyses in emerging economies, the GPI promotes the use of objective evaluation criteria. Procurement decisions that take a more comprehensive view of life-cycle costs and performance standards are poised to result in significant benefits for the host country's long-term economic development. These evaluations require the implementation of clear policies and processes as well as concrete metrics to justify higher cost acquisitions and to ensure objectivity and transparency.
Emerging economies often rely on least-cost analysis in procurement decisions in part due to the lack of professional training of the procurement workforce. Procurement specialists often do not have the training to execute the sophisticated calculations required for best-value determinations and life-cycle cost analysis. A key component of GPI is to strengthen the professional capacity of acquisition officials, to ensure their protection from accusations of corruption or fraud that may come with the use of new methodologies, and to promote knowledge-sharing on efficient and modernized procurement practices.